Comments on: Elasticsearch Percolator & Luwak: a performance comparison of streamed search implementations
http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2015/07/27/a-performance-comparison-of-streamed-search-implementations/
The Open Source Search SpecialistsTue, 12 Feb 2019 14:44:32 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8By: Charlie Hull
http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2015/07/27/a-performance-comparison-of-streamed-search-implementations/#comment-50095
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:20:27 +0000http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/?p=1531#comment-50095Interesting stuff! The benchmark code is pretty old. We’re a little busy right now so wouldn’t have time to collaborate, but we may well get back to you in the future! Thanks for making me aware of Manticore as well.
]]>By: Sergey Nikolaev
http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/2015/07/27/a-performance-comparison-of-streamed-search-implementations/#comment-50094
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:17:34 +0000http://www.flax.co.uk/blog/?p=1531#comment-50094Hi guys. At Manticore Search we’ve made a benchmark to compare Elastic Percolate Queries vs Manticore Search Percolate Queries. You can see the results here https://manticoresearch.com/2018/02/06/percolate-queries-manticoresearch-vs-elasticsearch/ if you like.
In short words Manticore PQ provides much higher throughput. It would be interesting to compare with Luwak, but the existing benchmark on github seems outdated, I couldn’t compile it. Ping us if you want to collaborate on this.
]]>